Body Paragraph

In One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest it is seen that as time goes by since McMurphy’s arrival, the balance of power inside the ward shifts as the Big Nurse looses power. The power that is held by The Combine starts to weaken as the weak patients start gaining confidence and power.

It is not only in the novel that this issue happens, the historical context in which the novel was written is that of rebellion and antiestablishment demonstration. During the 1950’s-before the book was written-and 1960’s-shortly after the book was published-many cases of people, who are oppressed or trampled, who defy the power of the Combine. The Civil Rights movement of the 1950’s is a perfect example of this change in power. An oppressed group of people fought-even the government-to acquire equality and rights that every human being should have. This time period is also the time period is also marked with the happening of the Cold War, in another aspect this can also be seen as a shift in the balance of power. The USSR with its communist regime starts to defy the powers of capitalism that rose in the lathe nineteenth century in England. As the red wave of communism attempted to take over the world, the USA did the same with its capitalist model and its tricky propaganda. In this particular case there are two Combines; one defying the existing power of the other, just to replace it with other oppressive politics-perhaps more direct and tyrannical. The dispute between this two Combines created the same effect that the struggle between McMurphy and Miss Ratched did: sometimes the patients lost-Cheswick, Billy Bibbit-and other times they were liberated like Chief Bromden. Taking those events into account it is not surprising that the values of American society in 1950’s reflect a necessity for power. The American Dream, a car, a big house with a corporate job, it shows a necessity for control that was created by the very events that happened previously. The mix of all these events lead to a very scared society-the patients-that allowed any inmorale action the Combine saw fit to accomplish their goals. However both Miss Ratched and McMurphy’s methods are questionable. In the novel Miss Ratched manages to make the patients doubt MacMurphy when she tells them that he is out to get rich and that his goal is actually selfish. This coincides with McMurphy realizing he doesn’t wan to spend his life on the Ward and starts to behave slightly better. At this moment the shift in the balance of power that happens stops and favors Miss Ratched for a second. It is only when McMurphy and The Chief fight the guards that the balance of power leans completely towards McMurphy, and the Nurse looses most of her power.

Just like Miss Ratched, the Combine of the 1950’s America controlled their patients through fear. However, like McMurphy came to defy Miss Ratched, there were certain people how defied the Combine. Although many of the events happened after the book was written, they do reflect the spirit of time. The antiestablishment movements that protested the war in Vietnam is a perfect example of this. The patients were tired of the abuses and atrocities committed by the Combine-no matter what goal they were trying to pursue. Basically around that time, we see that a very intrusive and radical Combine emerges and has a power struggle with the other Combine. One could say that USSR and USA represent McMurphy and Miss Ratched, and that the shift in power is only so that McMurphy can abuse the patients too. It is also plausible that McMurphy is more like the protestors of the Civil Rights movement or the Vietnam War, that are trying to defy the Combine not always in the most correct ways. Any of those two analyses is perfectly valid. In a way the two perspectives are true, McMurphy might want to acquire power to liberate the inmates from the tyrannical rule of Nurse Ratched only to take over and apply his own kind of justice and rule. Even though McMurphy’s methods may be questionable and that his purpose is not always the best it is agreeable that he intends to replace an oppressive form of government. The representation of the values and events of the time period is show simoultaneously in many different ways. The USSR, for example, could represent McMurphy in the sense that they both try to take down a regime they consider oppressive. Ironically one can see McMurphy as the USA trying to battle a tyrannical, cruel Combine that deprives people from their freedom. During the 1950’s, 1960’s, and even 1970’s-despite that this is after the books publication- there is a wave of instability in the institutions in leading to an inversion in the possession of control and power. Civil Rights Movements, the Cold War, Vietnam War protestation, the various revolutions around the world and the birth of a new generation of individuals-true individuals in the sense of individuality and freedom of spirit and mind- are all different forms of challenges to existing powers. Whether it is a Combine challenging the power of another combine, or an oppressed group fighting the tyrants, or the general public who is tired of the abuses of the Combine, control and power belonged to a different person or group even if for a short period of time. Parallel to this, in the book McMurphy slowly takes over the Ward until the party were he completely takes power over everyone and becomes in charge. The climax of his rule comes when he chokes the nurse and completely destroys her. After this he is lobotomized and martyrized, and even though he is practically dead his figure and ideals lives on to inspire the Chief-and almost everyone else-to escape the Ward and defeat the Combine.   

The Danger of A Single Story

“The Danger of a Single Story”. It is incredible how one single story can mold our perception of something. More often than not, first impressions stick and one isolated mistake can lead to people forever having a certain view of you. This goes both ways, everyone has at some point judged someone without truly knowing them. You see this en movies, literature, and life: a single story-accurate or not-shapes the mentalities of people. Single stories form stereotypes and create certain mentalities about people.

            In her talk Adichie mentions how the British books she read made her think a certain way. She thought of only white people who lived in a British way. I can relate to that, at a young age my mom showed me movies and read books to me that were mostly written in the USA. Consequently, the characters I thought of in my imagination were Americans more than Colombian. Even my perceptions of certain daily aspects of my life were shaped by those books and movies; I pictured Christmas with snow and ice every-needless to say there is no snow in my country-and I recognized thanksgiving as a traditional holiday even though it doesn’t exist in most of the world. But I have also felt that people have certain perceptions of my country and me. This summer I was in a summer camp in NYC-a literature class- a girl was surprised at my English-my vocabulary more than my accent-and the knowledge I had of English. A few days later, I sat in the park of the University wearing a Miles Davis shirt. A guy walked up to me and said: Do you have jazz in Colombia? I answered that there was a small jazz scene but nothing special. Later that same day, the girl asked me if I knew how to salsa dance. I told her I did, but it still surprised me how salsa is associated with almost all latinos even though it is mostly Cuban or Puerto Rican.

            Everyone has certain perception-they may be derogatory or not-about other people. When they asked me if I could salsa dance-they were sure I did-it wasn’t with bad intention but it was a stereotype they had. Probably most of this stereotypes are cause by either a movie or book-through the means of globalization-or by a certain isolated event by an individual. Everyone has to stay away from creating misperceptions about others, particularly because anyone can be a victim of those veils of judgment.

Heart Of Darkness III

Darkness does not exist. It is merely the absence of light; which is normally paired with good and progress while darkness typically represents evil. In the novel Heart Of Darkness there is a paradox when it comes to the meaning of light and darkness. In the novel, light is a symbol of power and strength but not necessarily of good, then the darkness is a creation of the people who are allegedly the light. In this dichotomy-of good and evil, light and darkness-Marlow finds himself torn between the two sides of the spectrum.

            What is light? Typically it is progress, knowledge, power, good. Cities, which at a time were the hearths of culture and knowledge, were the lights of the world; places in a world-of brutality and savageness-that applied reason and humane policies were also referred to as the lights. In this novel, the light merely represents the power of certain people over others, an alleged superiority. Marlow demonstrates the irony and relativity of light with his first words in the novel, in reference to London: “And this too… was one of the dark places in the world”. The irony is that London-which was at this time the light of the world- was once a dark place in the world, controlled by an empire were knowledge and progress hadn’t arrived. What is most ironic is that light in this novel commits acts that aren’t pure or good at all. Colonizing through brutal means and entire population just for the exploitation of their resources (at this time the light is not only London but Europe). Daring to justify the acts through an absurd principle that says that the victims are inferior and need to be colonized. The darkness is therefore a creation of light, because Africa is not a place of darkness-at least no more dark than the rest of the world. What is dark is the actions commited by the light that does evil, inhumane acts.

            Really the light is the dark. Because even though the light is progress and technology, it uses its advantages to create hate and spread evil. The real light-which is supposed to do good-instead creates the darkness. In this novel, darkness is not the absence of light but the presence of it.

Heart of Darkness Blog Post 2

Two Novels, with apparently not much alike can have very similar aspects and at the same time have opposing meanings. Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad and One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest by Ken Kesey, are prove of this phenomena. They share a same view on a key issue, and yet have completely opposite meanings for a symbol.

One same object can have extremely different meanings depending on the perspective from where it is observed. Symbols, like other literary devices, too have that same property of ambiguity that any object has when seen under a different shade of light. Two novels share a same symbol: The Fog, yet this object-symbol in this situation-is very different under the particular light of each novel. One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, by Ken Kesey, and Heart Of Darkness, Joseph Conrad, share a common element in the fog. However, it is very different the interpretation and meaning that it has in the two novel. In One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, the fog, is a symbol of oppression, control and slavery-over the patients of the ward. In a practically polar matter, Heart Of Darkness the fog represents some sort of protection to the natives, who suffer the oppression of the colonizers, by obscuring the view of their aggressors. Not only by blocking the view of the oppressors is the fog present, it is also an extension of darkness and uncertainty; the main difference is that in Heart of Darkness fog is against the oppressors and an ally to the weak.

            Both Novels also plot a dilemma towards a situation were evil and wrongdoing is justified and accepted by society. In Heart Of Darkness the colonization of the Congo is justified by a common doctrine-or belief- around the European nations: The uncivilized inhabitants of certain continents need to be colonized, for their sake, and pushed-even against their will- to the modern world. In One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest, the ward justifies their actions with a simple premise: Certain people aren’t fit to be in the world and thus must be isolated until they are fit for society.

            Chief Bromden-One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest-is a victim of the fog, a device created by The Combine-to isolate him from the world and keep his mind in shackles. The Combine-for those who haven’t read the book-represents societies’ oppressing institution that work to control everything and everyone around them, the lashers of the world. In Ken Kesey’s novel, the ward is the combine who uses the fog to manipulate the patients and repress their mind. The Chief, who is submerged in the fog, is finally freed by McMurphy and recovers his freedom of spirit and mind. Cruising the Congo River, Marlow is faced with a somber silence. The air is dense as the sun fades and the temperature decreases, the midst turns into a thick fog. The view of the boat riders is obscured, and their journey is slowed down. In the midst of their confusion, the pilgrims suffer an attack in hands of the opportune natives. In this case the fog serves the natives who take advantage of this distraction to launch their attack on the colonists. The natives-to draw a parallel-represent the oppressed group of people, the colonists represent the oppressive combine. Thinking that the fog is part of nature it is very reasonable for the fog to be helping the natives, as if nature were doing all it could to fight the inhumane acts of men.

            The two authors-Kesey and Conrad- criticize The Combine of their own novel. Of course each Combine represents a different time period and mean of oppression. Kesey shows a more modern problem-on a smaller scale and considered mundane in some cases-while Conrad’s issue is more global and repelled by current standards. Kesey criticizes the justification of the methods used to control patients. He deems the procedures-shock treatment, lobotomy- inhumane and finds no justification in them. The Combine would say it is necessary for the patients to endure the cutting off of their brains, in order to be able to live in society. The vindication of imperialism maintains that there are “savages” who need to be colonized and that the Europeans are their saviors, they need to live like Europe and the USA, because that is what is best for them. It is the “white man’s” duty to drag them-using force if necessary-into the light that is civilization. Conrad criticizes the hypocrisy of this thought and insists that this idea is merely a cover for the real intentions of the Combine: To drain the colonies and profit from them. This embarks slave labor, raw materials, the spread of European culture and Christianity, basically a place to enforce the will of the colonizers. While millions of people suffered daily of disease and starvation and abuse, the European nations justified this with a doctrine that is ironic to its core: “We have to make them change their ways to ours, even if we have to do it by force, it is our duty to save these people” The end justified the means.

            It is interesting to see how both novels share one same object as a symbol (the fog) and give it to very different interpretations around one same subject. The fog is on a different side of the same fight in each novel. In One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest, the fog sides with the oppressor, in Heart Of Darkness it sides with the oppressed victims. As the fog drifts to either side of the spectrum, the conflict remains the same and the authors’ views side with the oppressed, despising the hypocritical Combines who feebly attempt to justify their inhumane acts.

Heart Of Darkness Part 1 Blog

It is easier to follow orders and to go with the flow, than to stand up for what is right and be rejected for it. When the British Empire reached it’s peek in the modern era and colonialism was extremely common among European nations, there was a believe that the “uncivilized” people, of nations outside Europe and USA, needed to be colonized in order for them to progress. Of course the colonizing nations would benefit from this “help” they were providing. In spite of this being the popular believe in England, there were-as in all oppressive regimes-certain people that did not share the view of the Empire. In Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad, Marlow is one of those people. How he reacts to his environment and his time period shows us his confusion towards the issue, and towards himself.

Marlow rejects the idea of colonization, he in fact mentions he “can´t bear a lie” ironically he is participating actively in a great lie of human history: The affirmation that some people are superior to others and therefore have the moral obligation to colonize them-this of course is just a justification for all the exploitation of raw materials and people. He also sees the horrors of colonization and describes the black workers as “nothing but black shadows of disease and starvation, lying confusedly in the greenish gloom”. He is clearly loathes the idea of colonization and human exploitation but he is still there working for who he thinks are the villains. One could argue that Marlow is not against the atrocities being committed in the Congo per se, instead he thinks that it is no use for the Europeans to be there and that the job they are carrying out in the jungle is ineffective. He doesn’t react in any abrupt manner to the violence and the misery being perpetrated there.

This confusion towards the image in front of him, reveals a lot about him, how his confusion is not only external but also internal. This book presents a dichotomy of good and evil. The dichotomy might be clear now but the line that separated good and evil wasn’t always so clear. At a time when there was a moral duty to colonize-according to the beliefs of the powerful countries-Marlow finds himself in the middle of his own personal dichotomy. According to the rulers of said countries, colonizing is not only right but a moral duty of the white man. Marlow-being a member of the British Empire, a seaman who travels the world-is drifting between his moral code of what is right and the doctrine of his nation and his culture. We see him drift in and out of both sides of the spectrum but he always tends to lean more with his ethics. Although sometimes for reasons that aren’t apparent, he despises colonization but yet doesn’t act on his hate towards oppression. Perhaps further on the book he will do something that confirms his feelings and makes them more than a mere reflection of what he sees.

Irony Post

 

Irony is a very common element to draw focus to a specific idea or point in an entertaining way. The song “Great Nations of Europe” by Randy Newman is a great example of irony. During the entire song irony is used to criticize the colonizing nations of Europe during the XV and XVI centuries mostly.

The tone of the song is very ironic compared with the lyrics. The song is-given that the author is the creator of the Toy Story soundtrack-extremely cheerful and cozy. The lyrics however, refer to a massacres, and betrayal and slavery. When the song mentions that “the great nations of Europe were quite holy in their way” in reference to the massacre of some Indians-in the hands of Spaniard conquistador Balboa- who were allegedly gay. This irony is clear because there is nothing holy in killing someone due to their religious or sexual orientation. The fact that they “had them torn apart by dogs on religious grounds” is even more ironic; they are killing someone and justifying it with religion, which is obviously absurd. The chorus of the song is full of irony, it says “hide your wives and daughter; hide the groceries too. The Great Nations of Europe coming’ through.” There is nothing great about a nation that rapes women and steals food. Great has a connotation of good doing. The author is being sarcastic because he knows that the nations were thought of as great in their time but they were really tyrants.

One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest Blog Response 3

-->

Throughout a novel, as events unravel characters are subject to change. In One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest this is particularly true and visible in almost every-if not all- characters. The power struggle and the chaos that McMurphy creates drive all the patients in the ward to change and become more powerful and strong, the staff of the ward also falls victim to this wave of change. The nurses and orderlies start to loose power and become impotent when it comes to controlling the patients. Most of the changes are explicit and visible, often narrated, however there is one character whose transformation is clear but is not explicit: Chief Bromden. Being the narrator makes him somewhat impartial to his own situation, without fully realizing it he changes throughout the novel to the point where he becomes a strong man who is no longer under the whips and chains of The Combine.

            When the novel starts-with Chief Bromden speaking- he is a very obscure man, who has been pretending to be deaf and dumb for over 10 years. He is actually very smart and insightful but the way he has been controlled-through drugs and mental abuse- has made him retreat back into the deepest corners of his mind. This is shown when he says: “It wasn’t me that started acting deaf; it was people that first started acting like I was too dumb to hear or see or say anything at all ”. The oppression and negligence of the hospital made him that way. His situation is so critical that he hallucinates that a fog surrounds him and clouds his vision of reality, machines spy him and try to control his every move. He feels that he has lost his human essence and his individuality; the control that the so-called Combine exerts over him has dehumanized him to the point of insanity. Being a victim of the combine during his entire life-the government taking his father’s tribe off their lands, having to fight the war which is known to be among the most excruciatingly painful experiences a human has to live, being interned in an oppressive mental hospital which drove him to insanity with their dehumanizing, mind numbing methods- caused him to be completely dead of spirit and mind. Bromden is so weak that even though he is huge he says to McMurphy that he “used to be big, but not no more”. After years of shady memories and days were the clocks didn’t advance at all-or made a whole turn in would seemed like a second- Chief Bromden’s mind is set free.

            With McMurphy’s arrival comes the whole plot of the novel. He starts to defy authority and set the patients free. Bromden is no exception to this wave of lucidness-in mental patients- that McMurphy causes. The Chief starts to slowly escape the fog and set his mind free, he describes the moment when “the fog was finally swept” from him as “breaking the surface after being under water a hundred years”. Simultaneously he starts to act with his mind free and without the fog’s intervention. He raises his hand in the vote for the baseball game. He starts talking for the first time in years, he decides to go to the fishing trip, he fights the black boys along McMurphy, he gets drunk. Finally he decides to euthanize McMurphy and pick up the panel and throw it to the window to escape. The best example of the Chief Bromden’s change in the novel is his physical perception of himself, “he used to be big but not anymore”, later in the novel he mentions how his “foot was bigger than I’d ever seen it”. He doesn’t actually grow physically but his mind perceives it so. The real change is in his spirit and his mind, where he becomes a giant.

            McMurphy drags Chief Bromden out of the fog, he liberates his mind and humanizes him. After years of routine and control, of monotonous and abusive treatments designed to cripple the mind and the spirit of a man, McMurphy creates a revolution of change-redundant as that may be- that spreads like the wake of a boat in calm waters through the patients. Bromden is perhaps the one that changes the most with this revolution. He goes from one end of the spectrum to the complete other side. First he is a man who has pretended to be deaf and dumb for ten years, unnoticed, taken for granted, a chronic. In only a matter of months he has recovered all his consciousness, his confidence and even his size. His mind which was lost in haze of drugs and shock treatments is suddenly set free and empowered, to the point that-in his own mind-he becomes big and strong once again, so brave that he manages to escape and kill-out of pity and respect-the man who set him free.

One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest Blog response 2

Often in literature symbols or objects are thoroughly described using imagery. The author appeals to the five senses of the reader to evoke a very vivid image in the object being described. In One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest Ken Kesey describes machines through imagery to show the control that the ward has over the patients how they dehumanize them. The machines are a clear symbol of that dehumanization that the inmates suffer, and how their individuality and freewill is constantly removed through medicine and mental control.

            On page 141 The Chief describes a moment when he wakes up at night: “… I woke up, my eyes were all crusted over and the dorm was full of smoke, wires in the walls loaded to the limit, twisting and sparking death and hate in the air-all to much for me to take so I’d ram my head under the pillow and try to get back to sleep. Every time I peeked back out there would be the smell of burning hair and a sound like side meat on a hot griddle”. This quote is loaded with imagery, appealing to sound, to smell, to sight, to taste and touch, all describing the machinery on the wall. The author also personifies the machines giving them power to make actions and movements. “Twisting and sparking death and hate” the machines scare Chief Bromden and impose that veil of hate and control over the inmates. It is implied that this visions of machines are caused by a error in the dose of medicine given, this shows how the people who run the ward are trying to control the patients planting fear and paranoia in their minds, crippling their ability to think clearly. Machines are basically the opposite of a human, or the inverse. They can perform many functions that humans can-often quicker and with better results-but they are repetitive and dependent. The Big Nurse is trying to create machines out of the patients, making them dependent on her and her authority, submerging them in a numbing routine of helplessness and abuse.

            The imagery in the description of the machines depicts a hostile environment. Burning hair, hate, sparkles, smoke, twists, death, meat on a griddle. When one reads this description-at least I-imagines a factory, a dark factory where there is no sanitation or rights for the workers. Something closely related to a still mill. Everything is burning and the machines are constantly processing the molten metal to create no metal-possibly for war or destruction-and with each step, the free hot liquid that is the molten metal is slowly caged in by the machines to become this lifeless artifact to serve a larger machine. This picture came to mind as I read that passage in the book. Possibly Chief Bromden is scared that the machines will dehumanize him to the point that he-and any other patients-become lifeless shapes.

One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest Blog 1

There is a certain appeal to the fog. A mystical quality to it, that wakes up the curiosity inside us. However, the fog has also a negative connotation, mystery, death, uncertainty. In the novel-One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest- the “fog” is a very present and controversial symbol. What is the “fog’s” meaning in the novel? What is its’ role? The fog is a symbol of the control society places on certain people-liberators, leaders, or other rebellious characters like McMurphy- to prevent them from dragging others out of the fog. The others are in the "fog" because they are scared of reality and use it to hide from the world's cruelty. Ultimately the "fog" is made to dehumanize its inhabitants and turn them into wires and cables and screws of the machine-metaphorically speaking- that is society.

We first here about the “fog” when Chief Bromden is dragged to be shaved by the orderlies, apparently being shaved is something he dreads, due to the mistreatment of the orderlies. In the mist of his panic and rage he sees the “fog”-a hallucination- the room and he passes out for the rest of the shave. Essentially fog is an obstructer of our sight, a veil to cover what is behind it. It symbolizes the control that the hospital-or society- has over its’ inhabitants. How they try to block the visions of the patients and extract from reality. A reality that is frightening and dangerous. So frightening that possibly the patients search for the “fog” and feel safe inside it, because freedom implies risk taking and facing consequences, thus they can find in the “fog” an escape from reality.Later we see how McMurphy is "dragging them (the patients) out of the fog"and how in freedom the patients gain control of their situation even if for a short moment. They defy Miss Ratched and McMurphy manages to vanish the "fog", the effort however goes in vain when the Big Nurse overpowers the patients. The imposer of the “fog” is Miss Ratched, who has neglected her patients’ freedom and reduced their lives to monotonous cycles of mental slavery. McMurphy is there, in the hospital, to free the patients of the “fog”, that is so dense that it has become necessary for the men in the ward, who have lost their individuality and their essence. Becoming mechanical machines- redundant as that may sound- that only function under the whip of the nurse. Who treats them as cogs in the big machinery that is the Combine, removing in them any sense of individuality.

There are several questions this novel tries to present through the symbol of the “fog”: Are people constantly trying to escape reality, finding comfort in negligence? Is the fog self-imposed or is it created by people who want complete control? Is it better to be in the fog, feeling safe, or to be free of mind? These are questions to think about throughout life. But to answer the first question: What is the fog? The fog symbolizes two main things, first an escape from the world’s tearing reality and the prison our mind lives in to avoid facing the abyss. Second the uncertainty and confusion that certain agents apply to remain to acquire control. Fog is a essentially a gas that blocks our vision and distorts reality, either because we ourselves don't want to see the reality or because other people want to hide the world outside the fog, we are trapped in it and often need characters like McMurphy to free us from it.

Waiting For Godot Movie Scene

Waiting For Godot Blog Response 2

The opening scene of Waiting for Godot is superb, and as in many plays, novels and movies, the opening scene is crucial and full of meaning. The case is so in this movie. The opening scene shows a lot more than what is apparent, and it illustrates a great deal about the novel. That is why I chose it for my analysis.

First the setting: desolate, dry, dead. A plain of rock and dullness far as the eye can see, but set on a small stage of rocky hills and a road. The tree,  is a symbol of life. However the tree is dead, and alones. This contrasts to what a tree would symbolize in common literature. The setting is nothing there is no life, it shows the absurdity of the situation. The vast nothingness can symbolize life and its lack of meaning. The tree represents the hope that we all have in our vast plain of nothingness, a hope that never lives and never fully dies. The characters appear followed by a period of silence in which Estragon attempts to remove his boot. The two men are in an unknown place; this doesn’t seem to worry them all that much. They are more preoccupied with the location of Godot, and all the while Estragon attempts to remove his boot, a boot that represents the burden of society and its quest to find meaning. The boot has to be removed every day (to paraphrase Vladimir) and however it is a pain for Estragon, a necessary pain. The boot is to Estragon what the rock is to Sisyphus. Then comes the phrase “nothing to be done”. The phrase simply illustrates the lack of hope in life, the absurdity of the situation. They have reached the point to where they accept the absurd and take of the boot. Because there is nothing to be done.

Waiting For Godot Blog 1

Waiting For Godot Blog 1

As I finished reading the last page of Waiting for Godot by Samuel Beckett I was left with a feeling of uncertainty and confusion. I didn’t quite understand it, to the point that I was frustrated and disliked the play. My confusion and frustration was rooted in the lack of plot and action in the play. Who is Godot? Why are they there? I had so many questions and no answers. Later I started to understand that this had no meaning and that the point of the author was exactly to write a very inconclusive play. From what I gathered, Vladimir and Estragon are waiting for something or someone-Godot- all they know is they want to find him or it desperately. The two men constantly mention that Godot will save them. What Godot represents is something people seek eternally: a meaning to their life. Often they think of hanging themselves, the thought of Godot’s possible appearance-or even existence- restrains them. It is definitely a very abstract book, even it could be labeled minimalist. The vast endless plain-nothingness as described in the book- is a representation of human existence, how it is vast and plain and endless. And with all this people still wait for something or someone who will never appear and will promise to appear tomorrow.

The Stranger Blog Response 3

Existence is Absurd

Existence is absurd. Life has no meaning. Eventually people will die, and it won’t matter what they did in their lifetime because at the end we will all be dust. If one would enter the debate of the meaning (or lack of) of life, the discussion would last forever. The arguments are intangible and subjective, it is all a matter of perspective. What is unquestionable is that the idea that the book tries to convey is: Existence is Absurd. All along the novel Meursault expresses his disregard for life and how nothing really matters. He kills the Arab, and he never finds a reason for why he did it, precisely that his disregard for life drives him to think at the moment constantly. The last paragraph shows how Meursault, after a short near-death panic, returns to his normal state and accepts death with one thought in mind: Existence IS absurd.

The Stranger Blog response #2

“ ‘Why, why did you shoot at a body that was on the ground? ’ Once again I didn’t know how to answer.” p 68

            This quote is missing a key piece of information. The reason. Why did Meursault shoot the man? And why did he keep shooting him when he was dead? Many people debate over this issue and criticize the fact that the exact reason is never revealed. I think that the author excludes that information on purpose (that much is obvious) and that the exclusion of this explanation is very important when it comes to understanding the character and the novel itself. This fact reveals (or confirms) Meursault’s existentialist character, he doesn’t think about the future, or past, and he simply does things as situations present themselves before him. Possibly he truly doesn’t know why he did it, since in his perspective life is worthless, he sees no reason to do or not do anything. Therefore he just shoots the Arab, as a reaction to the absurdity of his situation. Subconsciously, one could argue, Meursault wants to shoot the Arab. Not because he hates him or wants him dead, but because it is a way to fight and rebel against the absurdity and meaninglessness of life.

The Stranger Reflection Chapter 1-4

“Maman died today. Or yesterday maybe, I don’t know. I got a telegram from the home: ‘Mother deceased. Funeral tomorrow. Faithfully yours.’ That doesn’t mean anything. Maybe it was yesterday.” Page 1

This quote is the opening line of the novel. It is an amazing way to open a novel, at first it might seem like trivial information but it isn’t. It shows a key trait of the main character. He is indifferent, unemotional. The fact that his mother’s death is a very irrelevant subject and that he decides to focus on the day she died, shows his existentialist persona. The sentence “that doesn’t mean anything” could be interpreted in two ways. First you could say that the telegram doesn’t reveal the date of Maman’s death. This one is more explicit, one could even argue that subconsciously when Mersault says “That doesn’t mean anything” he is referring that his mother’s death is not of great importance.

“I would rather not have upset him, but I couldn’t see any reason to change my life. Looking back on it, I wasn’t unhappy. When I was a student, I had lots of ambitions like that. But when I had to give up studies I learned very quickly that none of it really mattered.” P 41

“None of it really mattered”. This quote shows once again Mersault’s existentialist nature, he has lost hope in life and doesn’t care about anything. He lives life on a moment-to-moment basis. Not regretting the past, not thinking anxiously about the future. He mentions that he lost hope after he was forced to quit his studies. That can show that he will eventually recover hope, or to the contrary he may continue down this existentialist path. It is too early to tell but given that he is an existentialist, he is unpredictable and may drift to the other side of the spectrum at any moment.

Color Symbolism in The Great Gatsby

 “It was dawn now in Long Island and we went about opening the rest of the windows downstairs, filling the house with gray-turning, gold-turning light. The shadow of a tree fell abruptly across the dew and ghostly birds began to sing among the blue leaves”

Colors often represent various sentiments in novels and due to their universality; many writers use them to convey emotions. In The Great Gatbsy there is a very strong use of colors by Fitzgerald. For example of page 152: “It was dawn now in Long Island and we went about opening the rest of the windows downstairs, filling the house with gray-turning, gold-turning light. The shadow of a tree fell abruptly across the dew and ghostly birds began to sing among the blue leaves”. This quote is describing a sunrise in Long Island. The colors represent the dull and sad environments that exist at the moment. Gray and Blue, they both describe that feeling. Gray is commonly associated with dullness and monotony, while blue is associated with sadness and nostalgia. However, there is also gold, it can represent many things: wealth, prosperity, success, and value. The fact that the house is turning gray and turning gold symbolizes the American dream, things may get rough but with hard work  one can turn gray into gold. The “blue leaves” and the “ghostly birds” are some sort of warning that even living the American dream, the most beautiful and simple living things (leaves) can still be blue, even while bathed in gold. That recurring message of the failure of the American dream is present in the quote and Fitzgerald uses colors to represent it. He puts into question the real value of material things and what true happiness is made of (if it does exist).